Secretos de Cuba
Bienvenido[a] visitante al foro Secretos de Cuba. Para escribir un mensaje hay que registrarse, asi evitamos que se nos llene el foro de spam. Pero si no quieres registrarte puedes continuar y leer toda la informacion contenida en el foro.

Recuperar mi contraseña

¿Quién está en línea?
En total hay 24 usuarios en línea: 0 Registrados, 0 Ocultos y 24 Invitados :: 2 Motores de búsqueda


[ Ver toda la lista ]

La mayor cantidad de usuarios en línea fue 1247 el Jue Sep 13, 2007 8:43 pm.

Resultados por:


Rechercher Búsqueda avanzada


Respecto a la normalización de relaciones o el intercambio de presos realizado el miércoles como parte del acuerdo entre Cuba y EEUU

54% 54% [ 42 ]
42% 42% [ 33 ]
4% 4% [ 3 ]

Votos Totales : 78

Secretos de Cuba en Twitter

Documental:El Gran Fraude Del Calentamiento Global

Ver el tema anterior Ver el tema siguiente Ir abajo

Documental:El Gran Fraude Del Calentamiento Global

Mensaje por odioafifo el Jue Nov 26, 2009 11:50 am

Documental:El Gran Fraude Del Calentamiento Global

Este Extraordinario Documental Explica Como La Gran Mentira Del Calentamiento Global No Puede Ser Causado Por El CO2 y Nosotros No Somos Los Culpables De Estos Cambios,Nosotros al Respirar Producimos CO2. ¿Tendremos Que Pagar Impuestos Por Respirar?










Cantidad de mensajes : 2577
Valoración de Comentarios : 423
Puntos : 3757
Fecha de inscripción : 02/09/2006

Ver perfil de usuario

Volver arriba Ir abajo

Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'?

Mensaje por Martin Fierro el Jue Nov 26, 2009 4:12 pm

If you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit[/url] (aka CRU) and released 61 megabytes of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

When you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential. As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:

Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.
One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:

“In an odd way this is cheering news.”
But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.
Here are a few tasters.
Manipulation of evidence:

I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.
Private doubts about whether the world really is heating up:

The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.
Suppression of evidence:

Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?
Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.
Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.
We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.
Fantasies of violence against prominent Climate Sceptic scientists:

time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat
the crap out of him. Very tempted.
Attempts to disguise the inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP):

……Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the **** “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back….
And, perhaps most reprehensibly, a long series of communications discussing how best to squeeze dissenting scientists out of the peer review process. How, in other words, to create a scientific climate in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank, whose views do not have a scrap of authority.

“This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?”
“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”“It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past. I’ve had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice !”

Hadley CRU has form in this regard. In September – I wrote the story up here as “How the global warming industry is based on a massive lie” - CRU’s researchers were exposed as having “cherry-picked” data in order to support their untrue claim that global temperatures had risen higher at the end of the 20th century than at any time in the last millenium. CRU was also the organisation which – in contravention of all acceptable behaviour in the international scientific community – spent years withholding data from researchers it deemed unhelpful to its cause. This matters because CRU, established in 1990 by the Met Office, is a government-funded body which is supposed to be a model of rectitude. Its HadCrut record is one of the four official sources of global temperature data used by the IPCC.
I asked in my title whether this will be the final nail in the coffin of Anthropenic Global Warming. This was wishful thinking, of course. In the run up to Copenhagen, we will see more and more hysterical (and grotesquely exaggerated) stories such as this in the Mainstream Media. And we will see ever-more-virulent campaigns conducted by eco-fascist activists, such as this risible new advertising campaign by Plane Stupid showing CGI polar bears falling from the sky and exploding because kind of, like, man, that’s sort of what happens whenever you take another trip on an aeroplane.
The world is currently cooling; electorates are increasingly reluctant to support eco-policies leading to more oppressive regulation, higher taxes and higher utility bills; the tide is turning against Al Gore’s Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. The so-called “sceptical” view – which is some of us have been expressing for quite some time: see, for example, the chapter entitled ‘Barbecue the Polar Bears’ in WELCOME TO OBAMALAND: I’VE SEEN YOUR FUTURE AND IT DOESN’T WORK – is now also, thank heaven, the majority view.
Unfortunately, we’ve a long, long way to go before the public mood (and scientific truth) is reflected by our policy makers. There are too many vested interests in AGW, with far too much to lose either in terms of reputation or money, for this to end without a bitter fight.
But to judge by the way – despite the best efforts of the MSM not to report on it – the CRU scandal is spreading like wildfire across the internet, this shabby story represents a blow to the AGW lobby’s credibility from which it is never likely to recover.
UPDATE: I write about this subject a lot and the threads below my posts often contain an impressive range of informed opinion from readers with solid scientific backgrounds (plus lots of cheap swipes from Libtards – but, hey, their discomfort and rage are my joy).

Traido de Babalu blog

Martin Fierro

Cantidad de mensajes : 2311
Localización : USA
Valoración de Comentarios : 440
Puntos : 1761
Fecha de inscripción : 27/11/2006

Ver perfil de usuario

Volver arriba Ir abajo

Re: Documental:El Gran Fraude Del Calentamiento Global

Mensaje por Martin Fierro el Jue Nov 26, 2009 4:23 pm

Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren involved in unwinding “Climategate” scandal

By Dr. Tim Ball and Judi McLeod Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Lift a rock and another snake comes slithering out from the ongoing University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit (CRU) scandal, now riding as “Climategate”.

Obama Science Czar John Holdren is directly involved in CRU’s unfolding Climategate scandal. In fact, according to files released by a CEU hacker or whistleblower, Holdren is involved in what Canada Free Press (CFP) columnist Canadian climatologist Dr. Tim Ball terms “a truculent and nasty manner that provides a brief demonstration of his lack of understanding, commitment on faith and willingness to ridicule and bully people”.

“The files contain so much material that it is going to take some time t o put it all in context,” says Ball. “However, enough is already known to underscore their explosive nature. It is already clear the entire claims and positions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are based on falsified manipulated material and is therefore completely compromised.

“The fallout will be extensive as material continues to emerge. Reputations of the scientists involved are already destroyed, however fringe players will continue to be identified and their reputations destroyed or sullied.”

While the mainstream media is bending into pretzels to keep the scandal under the rug, Climategate is already the biggest scientific scandal in history because of the global policy implications.

A throwback to the intro of the television series Dragnet, “Ladies and Gentlemen: “The story you are about to hear is true, only the names have been changed to protect the innocent”, the innocent in Climategate have already been thrown to the ravening wolves.

“There is a multitude of small but frightening stories in the massive files,” Ball writes. “For example I’ve known solar physicists Sallie Baliunas and Willie Soon for a long time. I’ve published articles with Willie and enjoyed extensive communication. I was on advisory committees with them when Sallie suddenly and politely withdrew from the fray. I don’t know if the following events were contributing factors but it is likely.

“Baliunas and Soon were authors of excellent work confirming the existence of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) from a multitude of sources. Their work challenged attempts to get rid of the MWP because it contradicted the claim by the proponents of anthropogenic global warming (AGW). Several scientists challenged the claim that the latter part of the 20th century was the warmest ever. They knew the claim was false, many warmer periods occurred in the past. Michael Mann ‘got rid’ of the MWP with his production of the hockey stick, but Soon and Baliunas were problematic. What better than have a powerful academic destroy their credibility for you? Sadly, there are always people who will do the dirty work.”

Indeed, Holdren’s emails show how sincere scientists would be made into raw “entertainment”.
How the deed was done

“A perfect person and opportunity appeared. On 16th October 2003 Michael Mann, infamous for his lead in the ‘hockey stick’ that dominated the 2001 IPCC Report, sent an email to people involved in the CRU scandal; “

Dear All,

Thought you would be interested in this exchange, which John Holdren of Harvard has been kind enough to pass along…”
At the time Holdren was Teresa and John Heinz Professor of Environmental Policy & Director, Program in Science, Technology, & Public Policy, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government. (Editor’s Note: He is now Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology—informally known as the United States Science Czar. )

““In an email on October16, 2003 from John Holdren to Michael Mann and Tom Wigley we are told:

”“I’m forwarding for your entertainment an exchange that followed from my being quoted in the Harvard Crimson to the effect that you and your colleagues are right and my “Harvard” colleagues Soon and Baliunas are wrong about what the evidence shows concerning surface temperatures over the past millennium. The cover note to faculty and postdocs in a regular Wednesday breakfast discussion group on environmental science and public policy in Harvard’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences is more or less self-explanatory.”
The Wednesday Breakfast Group

“This is what Holdren sent to the Wednesday Breakfast group.

“I append here an e-mail correspondence I have engaged in over the past few days trying to educate a Soon/Baliunas supporter who originally wrote to me asking how I could think that Soon and Baliunas are wrong and Mann et al. are right (a view attributed to me, correctly, in the Harvard Crimson). This individual apparently runs a web site on which he had been touting the Soon/Baliunas position.”

“The exchange Holdren refers to is a challenge by Nick Schulz editor of Tech Central Station (TCS). On August 9, 2003 Schulz wrote;

“In a recent Crimson story on the work of Soon and Baliunas, who have written for my website [1, you are quoted as saying: My impression is that the critics are right. It s unfortunate that so much attention is paid to a flawed analysis, but that’s what happens when something happens to support the political climate in Washington. Do you feel the same way about the work of Mann et. al.? If not why not?”

“Holdren provides lengthy responses on October 13, 14, and 16 but comments fail to answer Schulz’s questions. After the first response Schulz replies, “I guess my problem concerns what lawyers call the burden of proof. The burden weighs heavily, much more heavily, given the claims on Mann than it does on Soon/Baliunas. Would you agree?” Of course, Holdren doesn’t agree. He replies, “But, in practice, burden of proof is an evolving thing-it evolves as the amount of evidence relevant to a particular proposition grows.” No it doesn’t evolve; it is either on one side or the other. This argument is in line with what has happened with AGW. He then demonstrates his lack of understanding of science and climate science by opting for Mann and his hockey stick over Soon and Baliunas. His entire defense and position devolves to a political position. His attempt to belittle Soon and Baliunas in front of colleagues is a measure of the man’s blindness and political opportunism that pervades everything he says or does.

“Schulz provides a solid summary when he writes, “I’ll close by saying I’m willing to admit that, as someone lacking a PhD, I could be punching above my weight. But I will ask you a different but related question. How much hope is there for reaching reasonable public policy decisions that affect the lives of millions if the science upon which those decisions must be made is said to be by definition beyond the reach of those people?”

“We now know it was deliberately placed beyond the reach of the people by the group that he used to ridicule Soon and Baliunas. Holdren was blinded by his political views, which as his record shows are frightening. One web site synthesizes his position on over-population as follows, “Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A “Planetary Regime” with the power of life and death over American citizens.”

“Holdren has a long history of seeking total government control. He was involved in the Club of Rome providing Paul Ehrlich with the scientific data in his bet with Julian Simon. Ehrlich lost the bet. Holdren’s behavior in this sorry episode with Soon and Baliunas is too true to form and shows the leopard never changes his spots,” Ball concludes.

Meanwhile, even with an AWOL mainstream media, the Climategate snakes continue to slither out from under the rocks.
Al Gore to Speak at November Allstream Marquee Event

Event Proceeds Go To the David Suzuki Foundation

Changes in the global economy continue to shape the world and the environment in which we live. Guests of the 2009 Allstream Global Forum will be the first in Canada to hear former U.S. Vice-President Al Gore share his new and compelling vision of how business can play a pivotal role in ensuring these changes are for the better through innovation and investment in new technology. Proceeds from the event, which will take place on November 24, 2009, at the Allstream Centre at Exhibition Place in Toronto, will go to the David Suzuki Foundation and its efforts to help transform the Canadian economy in ways that are consistent with a sustainable future. Co-founded by award-winning scientist, environmentalist and broadcaster Dr. David Suzuki, the David Suzuki Foundation is a world-renowned organization committed to helping Canadians achieve sustainability within a generation.

Traido de CFP

Martin Fierro

Cantidad de mensajes : 2311
Localización : USA
Valoración de Comentarios : 440
Puntos : 1761
Fecha de inscripción : 27/11/2006

Ver perfil de usuario

Volver arriba Ir abajo

Al gore Pudiera Ser Demandado

Mensaje por odioafifo el Sáb Nov 28, 2009 10:40 am

Al gore Pudiera Ser Demandado Por Miles De Cientificos Por El Gran Fraude Del Calentamiento Global

PDRTJS_settings_538276_post_2800 = {
"id" : "538276",
"unique_id" : "wp-post-2800",
"title" : "Al+gore+Pudiera+Ser+Demandado+Por+Miles+De+Cientificos+Por+El+Gran+Fraude+Del+Calentamiento+Global",
"item_id" : "_post_2800",
"permalink" : ""

El Fundador Del Canal Americano Weather Channel Junto Con Miles De Cientificos Quieren Demandar Al Gore Por Fraude Sobre El Calentamiento Global.


Cantidad de mensajes : 2577
Valoración de Comentarios : 423
Puntos : 3757
Fecha de inscripción : 02/09/2006

Ver perfil de usuario

Volver arriba Ir abajo

Re: Documental:El Gran Fraude Del Calentamiento Global

Mensaje por Cubano Libre el Sáb Nov 28, 2009 7:16 pm

Cuando Al Gore se la envaina

José Javaloyes

Ha ocurrido, cuando nos acercamos a las primeras estribaciones de la nueva Cumbre sobre el Clima, en Copenhague, algo sin precedentes en el ya largo camino que tuvo su cima principal en Kioto, sede donde se suscribió el protocolo del mismo nombre, centrado en la doble premisa de que asistimos a un cambio en el clima de la Tierra, conceptuado como calentamiento, y de que el causante de esa mutación climática ha sido el hombre, por las emisiones de CO2 derivadas de la combustión de energía fósil, principalmente el petróleo y el carbón.

Pues bien, en estas vísperas de la Cumbre de Copenhague han aflorado informaciones que afectan por su misma raíz al clima mental de aceptación, como indiscutible de todo punto, de la verdad de esas dos premisas. Y que no sólo afectan por haberse descubierto ahora factores y causas que antes se ignoraban en el plano científico de los hechos, sino porque lo descubierto, advertido e identificado son manipulaciones fraudulentas de los hechos y de su presentación ante los medios de información y ante los foros internacionales.

El escándalo es de tal magnitud que la manipulación descubierta en la universidad británica de East Anglia, uno de los focos doctrinales centrados en la postulación del origen antropocéntrico del supuesto cambio climático, y estrecho colaborador institucional del IPCC (Panel Intergubernamental sobre el Cambio Climático de Naciones Unidas), merece ser ya definido y catalogado origen parcial de primera mentira global del siglo XXI.

La profundidad del engaño deriva no sólo de la ocultación de pruebas científicas de que el CO2 no es el único causante del efecto invernadero -al que se imputa el extravío del clima-, puesto que concurren otros factores como el metano y diversos ingredientes que en su interacción determinan desenlaces físicos y químicos en los que se disuelve la supuesta primacía del CO2, un gas primordial, de otro punto, en la génesis de la vida en nuestro planeta.

Pero no acaba ahí la cosa, puesto que la trama responsable de la estafa política y económica ha perpetrado una estrategia de lobby poco menos que universal sobre los medios y los foros de opinión, tal como más arriba señalo, para que ni la información llegara y para que se silenciara a los científicos opuestos a la tesis de que el hombre era el causante del supuesto cambio del clima, y para que se descalificase a los escépticos frente a la teoría establecida; tildándoseles incluso de "negacionistas", como la suprema negación de lo científico que se atribuye a quienes niegan el principio darvinista de la evolución. La cosa es tan gorda que hasta el propio Al Gore, el ex vicepresidente norteamericano que se ganó el Nobel con la matraca del CO2 y la profecía de la muerte de los osos blancos por la fusión del Polo Norte, ha tenido que admitir que el CO2 no es el principal responsable del supuesto calentamiento global, luego de que la NASA haya rebajado su impacto al 43 por ciento del proceso. Alguien tendrá que pagar por todo este engaño y por sus grandes consecuencias económicas. Consideremos una hipótesis de responsabilidad político-ideológica de la socialdemocracia. Se podría explicar.

Cubano Libre
Miembro Especial

Cantidad de mensajes : 1171
Valoración de Comentarios : 277
Puntos : 938
Fecha de inscripción : 04/08/2007

Ver perfil de usuario

Volver arriba Ir abajo

Re: Documental:El Gran Fraude Del Calentamiento Global

Mensaje por Contenido patrocinado Hoy a las 8:19 am

Contenido patrocinado

Volver arriba Ir abajo

Ver el tema anterior Ver el tema siguiente Volver arriba

- Temas similares

Permisos de este foro:
No puedes responder a temas en este foro.